Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of multiverse


Ignore:
Timestamp:
12/09/05 02:38:51 (20 years ago)
Author:
Daniel Kahn gillmor
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • multiverse

    v1 v2  
    11= Ubuntu's multiverse repository section =
    22
    3 Ubuntu is porting most of debian's non-free archive as well, but they can't distribute it as freely as the main archive (see [http://www.ubuntulinux.org/support/documentation/faq/helpcenterfaq.2004-10-20.1228090247 it explained in the ubuntu faq]).  So debian's `non-free` and `contrib` sections have been translated by ubuntu to their `multiverse` section.
     3[wiki:"Ubuntu GNU/Linux"] is porting most of debian's non-free archive as well, but they can't distribute it as freely as the main archive (see [http://www.ubuntulinux.org/support/documentation/faq/helpcenterfaq.2004-10-20.1228090247 it explained in the ubuntu faq]).  So debian's `non-free` and `contrib` sections have been translated by ubuntu to their `multiverse` section.
    44
    5 Often programs in `non-free` are not free because they discriminate against fields of endeavor (e.g. [wiki:pgplot], which is required non-commercial), or don't allow free modification of the source (e.g. [wiki:pine] or djbdns).
     5Often programs in `non-free` are not free ("as in freedom") because they discriminate against fields of endeavor (e.g. [wiki:pgplot], which is required non-commercial), or don't allow free modification of the source (e.g. [wiki:pine] or djbdns).  This might not affect CAL's use of a package, however.
    66
    7 Everything in that archive is at least free for ubuntu to distribute directly, but they make no representation about if any specific end user or group is free to use it or to re-distribute it.  By [http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ policy], each installed package must include copyright and licensing information in `/usr/share/doc/<pkgname>/copyright`, which is worth reviewing when installing a package to ensure that we can legally use it within CAL.
     7Everything in that archive is at least legitimate for ubuntu to distribute directly at no charge, but they make no representation about if any specific end user or group is free to use it or to re-distribute it.  By [http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ policy], each installed package must include copyright and licensing information in `/usr/share/doc/<pkgname>/copyright`, which is worth reviewing when installing a package to ensure that we can legally use that package within CAL, or if we need to deal with licensing issues.
     8
     9Packages installed from ubuntu's `main` or `universe` sections should be fine to redistribute within CAL without worrying.